2 Face Craps Strategy High Exposure, Low Recovery Do not play
Share
Let’s break this down carefully and show where the strategy has flaws, based on real probability, house edge, and risk/reward logic. The strategy you're asking about is:
🎲 Strategy Overview
- No Pass/Don’t Pass bet
- Place Bets:
- $25 each on 4, 5, 9, and 10
- $30 each on 6 and 8
- Hop Bets:
- Hop the 7 in two forms:
- $10 on 3–4
- $10 on 6–1
Total Bet:
- Place Bets: $160
- Hop Bets: $20
- Total at risk per roll: $180
📊 Mathematical Breakdown
🎯 Place Bets
Number | Bet | Hits (out of 36) | Payout | House Edge |
---|---|---|---|---|
4 & 10 | $25 | 3 | 9:5 | 6.67% |
5 & 9 | $25 | 4 | 7:5 | 4.00% |
6 & 8 | $30 | 5 | 7:6 | 1.52% |
- These bets cover 6 out of 8 box numbers, which gives broad coverage, but:
- You’re relying on numbers that take time to hit.
- You lose all six place bets if a 7-out hits.
- 🚨 Hop Bets – "The Dangerous Part"
You're placing two hop bets on different 7 combinations:
- $10 on 3–4
- $10 on 6–1
Both are one-roll bets, with only one specific dice combination per bet. That means:
- True odds: 1 in 36 for each
- Casino pays: 15:1
- House edge: ~11.11%
Let’s be clear:
You're betting $20 on events with only a ~5.56% chance of hitting, each roll.
🧠 Strategic Flaws
❌ 1. No Protection from the 7
You’re trying to "hedge" by hopping the 7 (just two combinations: 3–4 and 6–1), but there are six total combinations that make a 7:
- 1–6
- 2–5
- 3–4
- 4–3
- 5–2
- 6–1
You're only covering two of the six ways a 7 can roll. That's only 1/3 of the possible 7s — and even if it hits, you get $150, but lose $160 in Place bets.
Net result? Still a loss.
❌ 2. High Exposure, Low Recovery
You’re risking $180 per roll:
- $160 of that is vulnerable to any 7
- $20 of that is on high-edge, low-probability one-roll bets
If a 7-out hits, your only hope is one of your hop bets hitting — and even then, you’re likely losing money overall.
For example:
- If 3–4 hits:
- Win $150
- Lose $10 (6–1 miss) + $160 in Place bets = Net loss: $20
- If neither hits (which is likely): Loss = full $180
❌ 3. Unbalanced Risk-to-Reward Ratio
You're spreading across too many numbers and adding risky one-roll bets. There's no progressive edge or advantage mechanism — and you’re giving the house edge on:
- 6.67% (4 & 10)
- 4.00% (5 & 9)
- 1.52% (6 & 8)
- 11.11% (hop bets)
This creates a blended house edge of 4–6% overall, depending on roll outcomes.
Over time, this grinds down your bankroll, especially with the added bleed from the hop bets.
❌ 4. No Odds Bets = Missed Value
You're ignoring the best bet in the casino: Odds behind Pass or Don't Pass, which have 0% house edge. By skipping the line bet entirely, you’re also skipping the opportunity to get behind a point with purely fair odds.
That removes one of the few advantages players can have in craps.
✅ Suggestions for Improvement
If the player wants smarter play with less risk and better value:
- Eliminate the hop bets completely. They're short-term thrill, long-term drain.
- Focus on 6 and 8 Place bets: They hit most frequently and have the lowest house edge (1.52%)
- Consider a minimum Pass Line bet with full odds — the best value in craps
- If you want to cover 4 and 10, do it after a few hits using profit — not on the initial rollout
- Consider removing 5 & 9 if budget is tight; they have better odds than 4/10, but lower return than 6/8.
🧾 Final Assessment
Element | Value |
---|---|
Total Bet | $180 per roll |
Worst Bet | Hop 7s (11.11% house edge, one-roll, high variance) |
Best Bet | Place 6 & 8 |
Break-even Roll Needed | Multiple hits without a 7 — rare over time |
Long-Term Outlook | Bleeds bankroll slowly, then fast if streaks don’t favor you |
🎯 Summary:
This strategy looks exciting but performs poorly over time. The hop bets are high-risk distractions, and the place bets — though more solid — are too exposed without any odds protection or line-based leverage.
This isn’t a strategy designed to outsmart the game — it’s one that tries to outlast luck, and the math doesn’t support that long term.